If there was any soundtrack, it was atmospheric Muzak playing softly in the background. When folks were seated, they talked quietly among themselves, which was possible because the latest pop hits weren’t blaring out of oversized sub-woofers. There was something about the lush, heavy red velvet curtain covering the screen that gave the auditorium an aura of majesty and demanded that people be on their best behavior. But I do get why theaters don't.As patrons entered the movie theater prior to showtime, they naturally lowered their voices and spoke in hushed tones as they found their seats. No one ever goes that was a great intermission! It is only a ok intermission or a bad one never a good one.Įven live theater has come to hate intermissions.Īnd yeah, I like an intermission on a long show. Intermissions are just another potential touchpoint for people to get mad about the theater. ![]() Then when they do get back in, of course they are mid row and forcing everyone to stand to let them in. By the time they are done they are upset at ushers, staff etc. You always have one person who talked a little to their friends, then went to the bathroom after everyone else had already gotten in line for it, and then decides to saunter over after the get seated notification to get a "quick bite". The extra concession sales just don't cover the difference between an intermission and squeezing in one more showing.įurther, getting people in and out of the theater is a hassle. Unless the intermission is baked into the content package of the film and has lighting cues built in, the movie theaters probably aren’t going to do it on their own. Also intermissions wreck your concession stand at weird times that you’re not used to, especially if another sold out showing is coming up at the same time. Sometimes the extra concession sales are not worth having to set up the schedule in a way that forces additional copies of the film to be purchased, putting the movie in a smaller auditorium, etc. Longer movies dramatically fuck up the whole cadence, resulting in those situations where you see a brand new movie on its opening weekend. They also have to pay for each “copy” of the movie they get, both ones that they are contractually obligated to show and ones that they choose to show. Movie theaters are contractually obligated to show certain movies a certain # of times per day (it’s a little more complicated than that, but we don’t need to get into it). The feature really needs to be filmed and cut from the start with an intermission in mind to make it work correctly. ![]() The other issue: The theater would have to decide themselves where to pause the movie and if done incorrectly or at the wrong time, can be jarring to the customers and bring them out of the experience. A lot of theaters don't have dedicated projectionists sitting in the booth doing little to nothing all day anymore due to all the automation. We could do it manually, but then you have to have someone manually pause the movie, bring up the house lights. So, techinally the movie is still playing, but it just has a blank spot in it. A film with an intermission would need either:ġ) Two different DCP files so you can put an intermission queue in between or.Ģ) Have that single DCP file have a natural pause built into the file for the intermission. ![]() Because with digital cinema, it's very difficult to almost impossible to automate an intermission with a feature that is not designed for one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |